Identification of Legal Psychology as an Independent Branch of Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53933/sspmlp.v4i4.163Keywords:
branch of law, legal psychology, public relations, method of legal regulation, beyond a reasonable doubt, science, academic disciplineAbstract
The science article conducts a theoretical and legal analysis of a new field of scientific knowledge – legal psychology from the standpoint of its perception as an independent branch of law. In the context of the above, the problematic aspects of legal psychology as a scientific, educational and applied branch of legal knowledge are studied on the basis of previously developed by legal psychologists levels of interaction and integration of law and psychology. The formation of legal psychology as a science and vectors of application of its achievements in judicial practice is analyzed. The author's approach in the formation of a new independent branch of law – legal psychology and determining its place in the classification of branches of law is proposed. The author emphasizes the need and urgent demand for the separation of legal psychology as a separate special branch of law that can regulate specific legal relations inherent in the fundamental (profiling) branches of law. The relevance of the article is due to the fact that in domestic legal science the division of the legal system in the field is assessed not in terms of its practical value, but rather in terms of confirming and defending certain scientific and theoretical ideas and concepts, contrary to the expediency of combining certain legal relations in the branch of law to achieve the desired social result through comprehensive study and regulation of specific relations. This, in turn, slows down the formation of new branches of law demanded by legal practice, among which legal psychology is singled out.
It is emphasized that the question of the branch affiliation of legal psychology has not only theoretical but also practical significance, uniting individual legal relations in the field of law in order to achieve the desired social result through comprehensive study and regulation of these relations. Attention is drawn to the special classification of legal psychology as a special branch of law, as the latter combines the rules of law governing public relations and related to primary social relations aimed at concretization, strengthening certain rules of basic branches of law, while providing special legal regime for a particular type of social relations. By subordination in legal regulation, legal psychology belongs to the procedural types of branches of law, as it combines the rules of law that determine the procedure, the order for implementing substantive law (criminal procedure, civil procedure, commercial procedure, administrative procedure law). It is proposed to include legal psychology in an independent branch of law, given the presence of features that are inherent in the branches of law; the specificity of the regime of legal regulation; its direct connection with the needs of practice; recognition of its achievements in judicial practice; unification of certain legal relations in the subject of law; conditionality of functional purpose and the place of this industry in the legal system (its type in the classification of industries).
References
Ozerskyi I. Taking into account the social and psychological assessment of family relationships as one of the factors of the judge's inner conviction in making a decision on determining the child's place of residence. Economics. Finances. Law. 2021. No. 3. рр. 17-19. URL: http://efp.in.ua/en/journal-article/605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2021.3.3
Dudnyk, R.M. (2016). Sectoral differentiation of Ukrainian law: concepts, levels and trends. Candidate`s thesis. Odessa
Prylutskyi, R.B. (2013). On the problem of defining civil law as an independent branch of private law. Yurydychna nauka, 9, 15-27
Kostitskiy, M.V. (1990). Introduction to legal psychology: methodological and theoretical problems. Kiev: Vyisshaya shkola. 259 p.
Konovalova, V.O. (2004). Legal psychology: problems of integration. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 2(37), 168-174
Eric A. Posner. Law and the Emotions. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 103 (2d series). Chicago. The Law School the University of Chicago, 2000. 40 p.
Fischman J. B. What Is Judicial Ideology, and How Should We Measure It? (October 19, 2008), D. S. Law. 29 Washington University Journal of Law and Policy No. 133 (2009). URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1121228
Resolution of the CCC of the Supreme Court from December 23, 2020 in the case No. 712/11527/17 (proceedings No. 61-18882св19). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/93835748
Kostytskyi, M. V. (2016). Scientific approach to the structure of legal psychology as a science. Yurydychna psykholohiia, 1, 3-21.
The Supreme Court clarified what it means to prove a person's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Ukrainepravo. URL: https://ukrainepravo.com/law-practice/practice_court/vs-poyasnyv-shcho-oznachaye-dovedenist-vyny-osoby-pza-
Morozov, Ye. Supreme Court: Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt]. URL: https://blog.liga.net/user/emorozov/article/30597
Law of Ukraine "On Information" from October 2, 1992, No. 2657-XI]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12
Kontseptualizm (Conceptualism). URL: https://goroh.pp.ua/%D1%82%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%
Camus, A. The myth of Sisyphus. (O. Zhupanskyi, Trans.). URL: http://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Kamiu_Alber/Mif_pro_Sizifa.pdf
Mulrine Thomas V. Reasonable Doubt: How in the World Is It Defined? Mulrine. American University International Law Review. 1997. V. 12. № 1. P. 225.
Stepanenko, A. S. The standard of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal proceedings. Extended abstract of candidate`s thesis. Odessa
Beznosiuk, A.M. (2014). Proof beyond a reasonable doubt and reliability as standards of proof in the criminal process of Ukraine. Sudova apeliatsiia, 3, 23-28.
Kostytskyi, M.V. (2008). Transformation of the name of science, which provides the psychological side of legal activity. Naukovyi visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 5, 23-29.
Androsiuk, V.H., Kazmirenko, L.I. & Kondratiev, Ya Yu. (2000). Iurydychna psykholohiia. Kondraiev Ya.Yu. (Ed.). Kyiv. In yure.
On approval of the List of scientific specialties: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science, Youth and Sports from September 14, 2011, No. 1057. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1133-11т
Passports of specialties: Resolution of the Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission of Ukraine from October 8, .2008, N 45-06/7. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v45 6330-08
Legal psychology. Methodical instructions for seminars and independent work for the preparation of masters in the specialty 081 "Law". (Concluded by Holovko M. B.). Chernihiv: Chernihiv National Technological University, 2018.
Soloviov, O.V. The actual normative nature of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the factors that determine it. URL: http://khpg.org/index.php?id=1154523190#_ftn5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Igor Ozerskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.